Description:Q6364: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The concept of the Disoeuvre has been named and developed by Felicity Allen over the last decade through research and in dialogue with others - see www.felicityallen.co.uk/the-disoeuvre for more info. Recognising the often intermittent nature of an art practice for many women and those who are positioned as marginal to art’s production, the Disoeuvre acknowledges that we have had to work socially and institutionally, as well as in the studio, not only to make work, but...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The | The Disoeuvre: a definition in progress | ||
People positioned as marginal to art’s production | |||
must work socially and institutionally, as well | |||
as in the studio, not only to make work, but to | |||
change existing structures so that their work can be | |||
recognised and critically received as art. | |||
Rather than disregarding those whose conventional | |||
oeuvre seems interrupted and inconsistent, we | |||
socially and institutionally, as well as in the studio, | should look for artistic consistency in an artist’s | ||
not only to make work, but to change existing | work made in and beyond the studio, through | ||
structures so that | employment at art’s institutions, or connected, for | ||
instance, to the labour of care, activism and other | |||
social practices. | |||
As a critical tool, the Disoeuvre takes account | |||
of artists’ training in adaptability and their | |||
working lives across different sites. It responds to | |||
practices persisting through ‘feminised’ labour (as | |||
maintenance or precarity), domestic instability, | |||
transience of documentation, new recognition for | |||
overlooked visual activisms and curatorial strategies, | |||
archival gaps and is open to more. | |||
Revision as of 12:57, 28 August 2023
The Disoeuvre: a definition in progress People positioned as marginal to art’s production must work socially and institutionally, as well as in the studio, not only to make work, but to change existing structures so that their work can be recognised and critically received as art. Rather than disregarding those whose conventional oeuvre seems interrupted and inconsistent, we should look for artistic consistency in an artist’s work made in and beyond the studio, through employment at art’s institutions, or connected, for instance, to the labour of care, activism and other social practices.
As a critical tool, the Disoeuvre takes account of artists’ training in adaptability and their working lives across different sites. It responds to practices persisting through ‘feminised’ labour (as maintenance or precarity), domestic instability, transience of documentation, new recognition for overlooked visual activisms and curatorial strategies, archival gaps and is open to more.